Full Report
Over the past five years, poetry by so-called “patriots of Russia” has demonstrated just how rapidly the image of the war is changing. Whereas before 2022 poetry promised a swift triumph of the Russian will, it now accustoms the reader to war as a process that can last forever. Pro-war poets claim allies wherever they can even plausibly find them — from Mozart and early 20th-century author Osip Mandelstam to the metaphorical forces of light and darkness. This hodgepodge reflects the Kremlin’s lack of coherent arguments for continuing a “special military operation” that, after nearly five years, remains nowhere close to achieving its stated objectives.
Analysis Summary
# Morning News Roll-up October 13, 2026
## Overview
Today's analysis focuses on the evolution of Russian state-aligned influence operations conducted through cultural mediums, specifically "patriotic" poetry. The narrative has shifted from promising a swift victory to conditioning the Russian public for a perpetual conflict, reflecting the Kremlin's lack of a coherent long-term strategy.
## Top Stories
### Russian Pro-War Poetic Propaganda Shifts to "Eternal War" Narrative
- Summary: Analysis of state-aligned poetry reveals a strategic pivot. While early works (2017–2022) focused on imperial expansion and swift triumph, current iterations frame the "special military operation" as an endless civilizational struggle. This "hodgepodge" of imagery—mixing classical literature with religious metaphors of light versus darkness—serves to mask the lack of military progress.
- Source: hxxps://theins[.]press/en/opinion/andrei-arkhangelsky/298237
### The Weaponization of Culture: Purging "Liberal Delusions"
- Summary: Pro-war authors like Igor Karaulov and Alexander Pelevin utilize their platforms to advocate for a domestic "cleansing." The narrative frames the war as a tool to eliminate Western influences, including postmodernism and liberal values, characterizing the conflict as a defense against "Satanism" and "paganism" attributed to Western civilization.
- Source: hxxps://theins[.]press/en/opinion/andrei-arkhangelsky/298237
### Strategic Narrative Failure and Civilizational Framing
- Summary: As Russian forces face tactical stagnation in villages like Mala Tokmachka, propagandists have moved away from tangible military objectives. Instead, they employ TTPs involving historical revisionism (claiming Mozart or Mandelstam as allies) to justify the war's continuation to a domestic audience.
- Source: hxxps://theins[.]press/en/opinion/andrei-arkhangelsky/298237
***
# Russian Pro-War Cultural Influence Campaign
This campaign involves the use of state-aligned literary figures to disseminate Kremlin-friendly narratives, conditioning the domestic population to accept a long-term, high-attrition conflict.
## Key Points
- **Shift in Timeline:** The narrative has transitioned from promising a "swift triumph" (pre-2022) to normalizing "war as a process that can last forever."
- **Civilizational Framing:** The conflict is increasingly depicted as a metaphysical battle between Russian "Christian civilization" and Western "Satanism."
- **Internal Purging:** Propaganda advocates for using the war to "write off" debts and purge Russian culture of "liberal delusions" and "postmodernism."
- **Strategic Incoherence:** The reliance on a "hodgepodge" of contradictory cultural references reflects the Kremlin’s inability to articulate achievable military objectives.
## Threat Actors
- **State-Aligned "Patriotic" Poets:** Including Igor Karaulov, Alexander Pelevin (ultranationalist poet), and Olesya Nikolaeva.
- **Kremlin Propaganda Apparatus:** The primary driver and financier of these narratives to maintain domestic stability.
- **Motivations:** Domestic population control, justification for continued military expenditure, and the marginalization of internal dissent.
## TTPs
- **Narrative Normalization:** Using concise poetic forms to make radical pro-war sentiment more digestible for the public.
- **Historical Revisionism:** Claiming historical figures (e.g., Mozart, Mandelstam) as metaphorical allies to grant the war intellectual legitimacy.
- **Ideological Polarization:** Labeling Western influence as "Satanism" to dehumanize the adversary and frame the conflict as existential.
- **Exploitation of Economic Anxiety:** Framing war as a "clean slate" for personal debts and failures.
## Affected Systems
- **Russian Domestic Information Environment:** The primary target for these influence operations.
- **Cultural and Educational Institutions:** Used as platforms for disseminating the "Alphabet of War" and similar anthologies.
- **Social Media and Digital Publishing:** Platforms like LiveJournal and Telegram used for rapid dissemination of pro-war literary content.
## Mitigations
- **Counter-Narrative Development:** Supporting independent Russian-language media (e.g., The Insider) to provide factual alternatives to state propaganda.
- **Information Literacy:** Educating audiences on the TTPs of state-sponsored cultural influence operations.
- **Monitoring Cultural Output:** Tracking shifts in state-aligned literature as an early warning indicator for changes in Kremlin policy or military expectations.
## Conclusion
The transition in Russian pro-war poetry from "triumphalist" to "perpetual" indicates a long-term commitment to the conflict despite a lack of tactical success. Intelligence suggests that as military objectives become harder to reach, the Kremlin will increasingly rely on metaphysical and civilizational narratives to sustain domestic support. Defensive measures should focus on breaking the monopoly of these narratives within the Russian-speaking information space.